Why we built Mooring
Your records policy says it. Can you prove it?
Every regulated firm has a records policy and a retention schedule. Far fewer can show, on a given day, that the records in their register exist where it says, have a named owner, can be produced on request and were destroyed when they should have been.
By the Lowtide team · · 6 min read
The problem we kept seeing
Record-keeping rules for UK financial firms are clear about the outcome. The FCA's SYSC 9 requires firms to keep orderly records sufficient for the regulator to monitor compliance. COBS 11.8 requires recorded communications to be kept for at least five years. The Money Laundering Regulations require customer due diligence records to be kept for five years after a relationship ends. UK GDPR then requires personal data to be kept no longer than necessary.
So firms must keep records long enough, find them on request, and not keep them too long. All three, and with evidence.
The cost of getting it wrong is real. An analysis of 22 FCA anti-money-laundering cases over five years found 68% involved data problems such as outdated customer records, with fines totalling over £430m. In the US, regulators fined 11 firms more than $1.8bn in a single round of actions in 2022 for failing to keep business communications, and a further 12 firms $63.1m in January 2025.
What goes wrong today
In most firms, the records register is a set of spreadsheets, one per business unit or entity. Once a year, someone in the records or compliance team runs the conformance exercise:
- Emailing dozens of record owners to confirm their records are still where the register says.
- Chasing the ones who don't reply, often for weeks.
- Asking for a sample of records to be produced to prove they can be retrieved, and tracking the answers by hand.
- Working out which records have passed retention, checking for legal holds, and recording what was destroyed and on whose authority.
- Assembling all of it into a report for the risk committee or auditors.
The work is repetitive, the evidence is scattered across inboxes, and the picture is out of date as soon as it's finished. Large records management platforms can help, but they usually mean a long integration project with the firm's document systems.
How Mooring approaches it
Mooring starts from the register you already have. Import your Excel or CSV inventories; it recognises the usual columns and lets you adjust the mapping. No SharePoint or system integration is needed.
- Location checks. Every night, records with web locations are checked and marked Yes, No, Unverifiable or Not checked, with the reason.
- Steward attestation. Each record owner gets one email listing their records, with a single-use link and no account to create. They confirm or correct each record, and every answer is time-stamped. Mooring sends the reminders.
- Retrieval tests. A risk-weighted sample of records is sent to owners to produce within a deadline, and the results are recorded.
- Certified disposal. Records past retention are queued, legal holds block disposal, and each approved disposal gets a certificate that survives the record's deletion.
- Reporting. A live dashboard by entity and an annual report against four key controls, with an append-only audit trail behind it.
Mooring stores the register, never the documents themselves.
Example · Wealth and asset management
A wealth manager's annual records review
A wealth manager with three regulated entities holds a register of 1,800 records across client files, recorded calls, suitability reports and AML checks, owned by 40 people.
The records manager imports the three spreadsheets in an afternoon. Nightly checks find 63 records whose recorded web location no longer exists. An attestation campaign goes to all 40 owners; 34 respond within a week, and Mooring chases the rest. Owners correct 41 of the broken locations. A retrieval test of 25 records is completed in five days. Twelve records past retention are disposed of with certificates, and two are blocked by a legal hold.
The risk committee receives a conformance report showing results against each control, by entity, with the evidence behind every number.
This is an illustrative example, not a customer story.
What you get in the first month
- Your existing register imported and checked, with problem records named
- An attestation campaign run to every record owner, with reminders handled for you
- A first retrieval test with time-stamped results
- A conformance report you can take to your risk committee or auditors
Who it's for, and who it isn't
A good fit
- Wealth managers, asset managers and financial advisers
- Insurers, brokers and payment firms
- Any firm with a records register and an annual conformance exercise
Probably not for
- Firms looking for a document store. Mooring manages the register, not the documents.
- Firms that need a full records management platform with deep system integration
Sources
- FCA Handbook, SYSC 9: record-keeping (opens in a new tab)
- FCA Handbook, COBS 11.8: recording telephone conversations and electronic communications (opens in a new tab)
- Money Laundering Regulations 2017, regulation 40 (opens in a new tab)
- ICO: storage limitation principle (opens in a new tab)
- Finance Magnates: two-thirds of FCA AML fines trace back to outdated customer records (January 2026) (opens in a new tab)
- Katten: regulators fine firms $1.8bn for off-channel communications (2022) (opens in a new tab)
- SEC press release 2025-6 (opens in a new tab)
- ISO 15489-1:2016, records management (opens in a new tab)
Examples in this article are illustrative, not customer stories. Nothing here is legal advice.